ORCID stands for "Open Researcher and Contributor ID." Researchers can sign up for an ORCID unique persistent personal identifier which enables name disambiguation and tracking of their scholarly production across name or institution changes. At the ORCID website you can get more information about the initiative. Researchers with very common names, or who have changed their name over the course of their scholarly career, have a clear incentive to register; increasing numbers of publishers and granting agencies are encouraging use of ORCID identifiers as well. This list of 10 things you need to know about ORCID sums up the advantages of using an ORCID iD.
The definition of Open Access for scholarly communications provided by SPARC (the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition) is "the free, immediate, online availability of research articles combined with the rights to use these articles fully in the digital environment." Free, immediate, online availability to read articles is pretty self-explanatory; the right to use the articles in the digital environment might include text or data mining from the articles, or establishing different kinds of networks between them, to help researchers better understand research contexts. In contrast, Public Access refers to free and immediate online availability of research articles without the same rights to digital use.
A few important motivating factors for the Open Access movement include the extremely high costs of many scholarly journal subscriptions, and the fact that most scientific scholarly research produced in university settings is funded with government grants. If the public is paying for the production of research knowledge, it should also have access to those research results. A growing number of granting agencies, both governmental and non-governmental, are now requiring that research publications be made publicly available to read and download. For example, the NIH Public Access Policy requires that researchers deposit the final peer-reviewed version of grant-supported publications in PubMed Central. The NSF Public Access Policy requires researchers to deposit the version of record or final peer-reviewed version of grant-supported publications in the NSF Public Access Repository no later than 12 months after publication.
Peter Suber has defined several different kinds of open access (OA). In Green OA, an article might be published in a non-OA journal (one that charges for access to the article), but the researcher can still make the article available online via a personal website or a library or disciplinary repository. Often the journal places some restrictions on what format the Green OA version can take -- usually it cannot be a pdf of the final journal article, but must be the researcher's final draft. See the OA Resources box to the right for more information on understanding journal requirements. In Gold OA, an article is published in a journal that will make the final version of the article available for free, but usually charges the researcher a publication fee for doing so (although there are some alternative models where journals are funded by scholarly societies or academic consortia). The fees for Gold OA can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars, depending on the journal. Suber's brief overview of OA summarizes these and other relevant issues.
Click here for an infographic from 2013 by Randall Munroe (of xkcd fame) about scientific publishing and open access.
Click here for a timeline of significant events in the Open Access movement. These include the Budapest (February 2002), Bethesda (June 2003), and Berlin (October 2003) Open Access Initiatives, the NIH Data Sharing Agreement, and the White House OSTP Memo.
Interested in making an article you will publish Open Access?
If you need to comply with Open Access requirements for a grant, the companion RoMEO and JULIET databases can help you understand requirements. The OpenDOAR directory can help you find open access repositories.
To research the reputation of open access journals, check Beall's List (the Scholarly Open Access blog) to see potential, possible, or probably predatory OA publishers and journals. The DOAJ lists journals that have undergone some form of vetting, but inclusion in the DOAJ does not necessarily mean that a journal is not predatory, or that it publishes high-quality scholarship. See the Criteria for Determining Predatory OA Publishers for a checklist of characteristics to avoid in a publisher. Consider consulting with a librarian, who may have additional suggestions for vetting publishers.
© 2014 Whitman College Penrose Library |