Skip to Main Content

Social Justice 110

Finding information

Where and how to search for information depends on what kind of information you need, and for what purpose you need it.

If you are looking for scholarly information, it's a good idea to use scholarly databases through Penrose Library, the Penrose Library catalog Sherlock,  or to start with an internet tool like Google Scholar (but you may need to use Sherlock to help you access information you find with Google Scholar).

If you are looking for contextual or background information related to local issues or organizations, local newspapers or websites are a good place to start (see information in the Local sources page). Wikipedia can also be a helpful starting point, especially when it gives you references to reliable sources. If you are trying to find a specific organization or information fro a specific kind of organization, Google advanced search makes it easier to find, for example, reports from an organization with a .org domain extension.

Evaluating Source Strength

Determining the strength of a source depends a great deal on your question. What would you like to know, and what kind of source would provide that information?

The strength of a source also might have to do with credibility. How can you be sure that the source you are reading is accurate or trustworthy? There is no magic bullet here, but some things to consider include:

  • What organization, institution, business, nonprofit or individual supports or funds this source?
  • Is there any identifiable bias in the source? Is this bias related to the organization, etc., that supports it?
  • Who is the author? Are they identified and do they provide contact information?
  • Is the source dated clearly and accurately? This is especially important for web sources.

Other Evaluation Techniques

CRAAP Test is a method to help you evaluate the credibility, reliability and strength of your source.

 

Currency: the timeliness of the information

  • When was the information published or posted?
  • Has the information been revised or updated?
  • Does your topic require current, up-to-date information? Or will older, more historical sources work?

 

Relevancy: the importance of the information for your needs

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?
  • Who is the intended audience?
  • Is the information at the appropriate level?
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources?
  • Would you be comfortable using this source in a research paper?

 

 

Authority: the source of the information

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given?
  • What are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations?
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic?
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address?
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?

 

 

Accuracy: the reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the content

  • Where does the information come from?
  • Is the information supported by evidence?
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
  • Can you verify any of the information from another source or from personal knowledge?
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion?
  • Are there spelling, grammar, or other typographical errors?

 

 

Purpose: the reason the information exits

  • What is the purpose of the information? To inform? To teach? To entertain or persuade? To mislead?
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
  • Is the information fact or opinion?
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?

STOP

  • Ask yourself: what do you know about the information? Do you trust the source?
  • If the answer is no, get away from the source and search the information or claims.
  • If the answer is yes, it's still always good to double-check the information and claims!

INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE

  • Know the purpose of your source
  • Who created it? Look at the author, the publication, and the source type
  • Get new tabs opens and do a simple Google search to find background information about the source

FIND TRUSTED COVERAGE

  • Verify, verify, verify
  • Double-check the information with a trusted source (fact-checkers, Wikipedia, etc.)

TRACE THE SOURCE

  • Trace claims, quotes, and media back to the original context or source
  • Seeing the information in the original context can help you determine the accuracy of the claims

Logo indicating steps of SIFT method

Popular or Scholarly?

Scholarly or peer-reviewed sources are written by credentialed experts in a given academic field, such as history, geology, or mathematics. For many disciplines, this is the "gold standard" of academic publishing. To determine if something is peer-reviewed, consider:

  • The source: is the journal published by a University or other academic institution? Does it list who edits the journal?
  • The author: do they have an academic affiliation, and/or degrees listed (Ph.D, M.A., etc).
  • The content: are the claims being adequately documented? Are there sources cited (footnotes, endnotes, bibliography)?
  • The audience: does the article used advanced language and a specialized vocabulary? Are they writing for others who are experts in the field, or for a general audience?

Popular sources is a very broad category, but popular sources are generally distinguished from scholarly because they are not peer-reviewed. This does not necessarily mean they are untrustworthy or not useful, just that they are of a different sort. In determining if something is a popular source, consider:

  • The source: is it a newspaper, website or magazine aimed meant to entertain, provide basic news information, or persuade without providing in-depth analysis? 
  • The author: is the author identified at all? If they are identified, are they journalists or editorial staff?
  • The content: popular sources are generally shorter, and usually do not cite sources. These sources often have more images and advertisements. 
  • The audience: popular sources use general, easily accessible language and sentence structure. They don't use academic jargon or specialized vocabulary.

 

© 2014 Whitman College Penrose Library |